Amazon’s $200 billion AI spending plan looks dramatic because it arrived at exactly the wrong moment. Markets were already fragile, tech sentiment was wobbling, and US stock futures were pointing lower as investors digested another bruising session on Wall Street.

By the time Amazon reported, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq had slipped into negative territory for 2026, and patience was already thin.

So when Amazon shares plunged more than 10% after the bell - following a marginal earnings miss and a staggering capital expenditure forecast - the market’s verdict came quickly. This was not read as a sign of strategic strength, but as another stress test for investors already bracing for wreckage. The key question now is whether that reaction reflects genuine risk - or a short-term panic that may be missing the bigger picture.

What’s driving Amazon’s AI spending surge?

Amazon’s plan to invest around $200 billion in 2026 is not incremental spending. It is a deliberate acceleration across data centres, custom chips, robotics, logistics automation, and low-Earth-orbit satellite infrastructure. That figure dwarfs the roughly $125 billion spent in 2025 and comfortably exceeds analysts’ expectations, forcing markets to recalibrate assumptions in real time.

Crucially, Amazon insists this is demand-led. AWS revenue rose 24% year on year to $35.6 billion - its fastest growth in 13 quarters - as customers ramped up both core cloud workloads and AI adoption. CEO Andy Jassy was blunt on the earnings call: capacity is being monetised as fast as it can be installed. In other words, Amazon is not building empty data centres. It is racing to keep up.

Still, context matters. This spending landed in a market already leaning risk-off. Amazon’s slide rippled across tech, dragging sentiment lower as investors reassessed AI exposure more broadly. The reaction spilled into other assets too: bitcoin slid to levels not seen since 2024, silver resumed its decline after a retail-fuelled surge, and Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) revealed a quarterly loss driven by crypto weakness. This was not a calm market parsing nuance - it was one looking for reasons to de-risk.

Why did the market react so sharply?

On the surface, Amazon’s earnings were not alarming. Revenue beat expectations at $213.4 billion. AWS and advertising both topped forecasts. The earnings-per-share miss - $1.95 versus $1.97 expected - was trivial by historical standards.

But this earnings season is being judged differently. Investors are no longer rewarding scale alone. They want visibility on cash returns, especially as AI infrastructure bills balloon. Amazon’s free cash flow over the past 12 months fell to just $11.2 billion, despite operating cash flow rising 20% to $139.5 billion. The culprit is not weak operations, but capital intensity. AI spending is already compressing the numbers investors underwrite.

Guidance compounded the unease. First-quarter operating income is expected to come in below consensus, with management flagging roughly $1 billion in additional year-on-year costs tied to infrastructure and satellite expansion. In a market already unsettled by softening labour data - job openings at their lowest since 2020 and layoffs accelerating - Amazon’s timing could hardly have been worse.

Broader market fallout adds to the pressure

Amazon’s sell-off did not happen in isolation. While Reddit and Roblox surged on earnings beats and upbeat guidance, those moves felt like exceptions rather than the rule. The broader tone remained defensive, with investors increasingly selective about where they were willing to take risks.

Macro uncertainty is adding another layer. The nonfarm payrolls report, delayed to next week after the resolution of the US government shutdown, now looms larger than usual. Recent data has already hinted at cracks in the labour market, and any downside surprise could reinforce fears that corporate spending - including on AI - is running ahead of economic reality.

In that environment, Amazon’s decision to double down on long-term infrastructure reads less like confidence and more like defiance. The market is not questioning whether Amazon can spend. It is questioning whether this is the right cycle to ask investors to wait.

Is this a familiar Amazon playbook or something new?

Amazon has been here before. Its history is built on spending ahead of demand, absorbing scepticism, and emerging with structural advantages that competitors struggle to replicate. Prime, fulfilment automation, and AWS itself all followed that script.

AI, however, changes the scale. This time, Amazon is not alone. Microsoft and Alphabet are spending heavily, too, which compresses early-mover advantage and stretches payback timelines. The competitive moat forms more slowly when everyone is building simultaneously.

That said, Amazon is not merely a buyer in the AI ecosystem. Through Annapurna Labs, it has developed a substantial in-house chip business. Custom processors such as Trainium and Graviton now generate a combined annual revenue run rate above $10 billion, helping offset dependency on third-party suppliers and laying the groundwork for future margin expansion. That internal capability may prove critical once the spending phase peaks.

Expert outlook: Warning sign or opportunity?

This does not look like a balance-sheet warning. Amazon generated $77.7 billion in net income in 2025 and retains ample financial flexibility. The real risk is narrative drift - allowing markets to frame AI spending as unchecked ambition rather than disciplined expansion.

For short-term investors, discomfort is justified. Cash flow is under pressure, sentiment is fragile, and the macro backdrop is deteriorating. Volatility is likely to persist until the market clarifies when AI spending will moderate.

For long-term investors, the sell-off raises a different question. If AWS demand remains strong and infrastructure utilisation stays high, today’s spending could underpin years of pricing power and operating leverage. Amazon is asking the market to fund capacity now in exchange for dominance later. History suggests that trade has often worked - but it rarely feels comfortable at the time.

Key takeaway

Amazon’s massive AI spend is not a signal that the business is faltering. It is a signal that the market’s tolerance for long-dated payoffs has sharply diminished. The company is choosing to invest through a risk-off cycle, not retreat from it. Whether this proves to be a warning or a buying opportunity will hinge on execution, cash flow recovery, and how quickly AI demand translates into visible returns. The next few quarters will tell whether this sell-off reflects discipline or short-sighted fear.

Amazon technical outlook

Amazon has experienced a sharp downside move, with the price breaking lower from its recent range and falling toward the lower end of the charted structure. Bollinger Bands have expanded significantly following the decline, indicating a sudden increase in volatility after a period of more contained price action. 

Momentum indicators reflect the intensity of the move: the RSI has dropped into oversold territory and is currently flat at low levels, signalling persistent downside momentum rather than an immediate stabilisation. Trend strength readings show limited directional dominance, with ADX remaining relatively subdued despite the sharp price adjustment. 

Structurally, price has moved well below prior resistance areas around $247 and $255, placing recent action in a new price range relative to the earlier range. 

Gold prices softened after US jobless claims jumped to 231,000, their highest level in nearly two months, overshooting forecasts by almost 20,000 claims. On the surface, weaker labour data was expected to bolster gold’s safe-haven appeal. Instead, spot prices slid more than 2% on the session, highlighting a growing disconnect between economic stress signals and market positioning.

This divergence matters because labour data remains the Federal Reserve’s most sensitive policy input. With job openings falling to a five-year low and hiring still subdued, traders are now questioning whether gold is simply consolidating or misreading the next macro turn.

What’s driving Gold and US jobless claims?

The rise in initial jobless claims was sharp, but not clean. Claims jumped by 22,000 in a single week, the largest increase since early December, pushing the headline figure well above economists' expectations of 212,000, according to reports. 

Severe winter storms distorted regional employment data, leading to outsized increases in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and the Midwest. Seasonal adjustment issues around year-end hiring cycles added further noise.

Yet the broader labour picture shows genuine softening beneath the volatility. Job openings fell to 6.54 million in December, the lowest level since September 2020, while November data were revised sharply downward. 

Hiring improved marginally but remained historically weak, reinforcing what economists describe as a “low-hire, low-fire” labour market. That mix suggests cooling momentum rather than outright recession - a nuance gold traders are still digesting.

Why it matters

Labour market trends directly influence rate expectations, and that connection explains gold’s muted reaction. While jobless claims surprised to the upside, continuing claims remain historically low, and the four-week average still points to stability rather than stress. 

As Carl Weinberg of High Frequency Economics put it, “There is no sign of the kind of layoffs we expect to see in a weakening labour market during the early days of a recession”.

For the Federal Reserve, this data does little to force an immediate policy shift. Oxford Economics’ Bernard Yaros noted that weather distortions and data discontinuities limit the signal value of a single claims report, adding that nothing has yet altered the Fed’s near-term calculus. Without a clear pivot in rate expectations, gold lacks the macro catalyst it typically feeds on.

Impact on Gold markets

Market watchers highlighted that gold’s decline following the claims data reflects positioning rather than fundamentals. Spot prices traded near session lows at $4,860 per ounce after the release, despite weaker-than-expected labour numbers. That reaction suggests traders prioritised dollar resilience and rate stability over headline economic weakness.

At the same time, falling job openings and delayed payroll data introduce uncertainty that gold markets rarely ignore for long. If upcoming employment reports confirm a broader slowdown - rather than weather-related noise - gold’s current pullback may prove temporary. The metal has historically responded more forcefully to trend confirmation than to isolated shocks, especially when monetary policy credibility is at stake.

Expert outlook

Most economists expect labour conditions to improve gradually through 2026 as interest-rate relief filters into demand, supported by recent tax cuts. That outlook caps immediate upside for gold, as it argues against aggressive Fed easing in the near term.

Still, risks are asymmetric. Job openings are falling faster than unemployment is rising, a pattern that often precedes broader labour weakness. With January’s non-farm payrolls report delayed due to the government shutdown, gold traders face a data vacuum that could amplify volatility once clarity returns. The next clean read on employment momentum may prove decisive.

Key takeaway

US jobless claims have risen sharply, but the signal remains clouded by weather effects and seasonal distortions. Gold’s pullback reflects market caution rather than a rejection of its safe-haven role. With job openings falling and payroll data delayed, the next labour release carries outsized importance. Traders should watch for confirmation, not headlines, before judging gold’s next move.

Gold technical outlook

Gold has consolidated after a sharp advance into new highs, with price now oscillating around the $4,850 area following a volatile pullback. Bollinger Bands remain widely expanded, indicating that volatility remains elevated despite the recent moderation in price movements. 

Momentum indicators show a neutralising profile: the RSI has flattened near the midline after previously reaching overbought conditions, reflecting a balance between upside and downside momentum. Trend strength has eased from extreme levels, with ADX readings lower than during the acceleration phase, suggesting a transition from strong directional movement into consolidation. 

Structurally, price remains well above earlier consolidation zones around $4,300, $4,035, and $3,935, underscoring the magnitude of the prior rally.

Bitcoin’s price has fallen roughly 40% from its October peak, rattling markets and reviving fears of another brutal crypto winter. The latest leg down included an 11% weekly loss as global markets flipped risk-off, dragging digital assets lower alongside volatile US equities. For many investors, the move feels uncomfortably familiar.

The concern centres on Bitcoin’s four-year cycle, which in past downturns delivered collapses of up to 80%. Yet analysts at K33 argue that today’s sell-off lacks the structural stress that defined previous crashes. With forced liquidations already flushed out and institutional buyers now entrenched, the question is no longer whether Bitcoin is falling - but whether this decline is a reset or the start of something far worse.

What’s driving Bitcoin’s latest sell-off?

Bitcoin’s decline has unfolded alongside a broader shift in global risk appetite. Equity markets have turned volatile again, with technology stocks leading losses as investors reassess growth expectations and valuation risk. Crypto, which has increasingly traded in sync with US equities, followed the same path as capital rotated toward safety.

Leverage has amplified the move. In just a few days, more than $1.7 billion in leveraged long positions were liquidated across crypto markets.

Funding rates flipped sharply negative, signalling that traders rushed to exit bullish calls. Historically, such conditions appear during periods of stress, but they also tend to surface after excessive optimism has already been wrung out of the market.

Why it matters

For newer investors, sharp drawdowns often trigger panic selling. Bitcoin’s past cycle crashes trained the market to expect catastrophic declines once momentum breaks. That behavioural memory alone can deepen sell-offs, even when underlying conditions differ.

K33’s analysts argue that this cycle lacks the forced sellers that defined 2018 and 2022. Those bear markets were driven by cascading failures - from Terra-Luna to FTX - that triggered margin calls and indiscriminate liquidation. “The structure that produced 80% crashes simply isn’t present today,” the firm noted in its latest report.

Impact on crypto markets and equities

The sell-off has spilled well beyond Bitcoin itself. Crypto-linked equities have suffered steep losses as investors reassessed exposure across the ecosystem. Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, fell more than 5% in a single session and is now down nearly 70% over six months.

Mining stocks were hit even harder. Companies that pivoted toward high-performance computing and AI infrastructure failed to escape the downturn. HUT 8 fell 8%, Core Scientific nearly 9%, and IREN plunged 17%. As Aurelie Barthere of Nansen observed, “The correlation between crypto and US equities is turning positive again as they sell off simultaneously,” reinforcing Bitcoin’s sensitivity to macro volatility.

Expert outlook

K33 identifies $74,000 as a key support zone. A clean break below it could open the door to a retest of the 2021 peak near $69,000, or even the long-term average around $58,000. While those levels appear daunting, analysts note that Bitcoin has already absorbed heavy liquidation pressure without systemic stress.

The presence of spot Bitcoin ETFs has quietly reshaped market dynamics. Pension funds and long-term allocators now account for a growing share of demand, dampening the reflexive selling seen in past cycles. The near-term path may remain volatile, but analysts increasingly frame this drawdown as a structural correction rather than a cycle-ending collapse.

Key takeaway

Bitcoin’s 40% decline has revived memories of past cycle crashes, but the market structure has changed meaningfully. Forced sellers are largely absent, leverage has already been flushed, and institutional demand is now embedded through ETFs. Volatility may persist, yet analysts increasingly view this drawdown as a reset rather than a collapse. The next signals to watch are ETF flows, equity market stability, and whether key support zones hold.

Bitcoin technical outlook

Bitcoin has extended its decline, moving further toward the lower end of its recent price range after breaking down from a prolonged consolidation. Price is trading below the lower Bollinger Band, while the bands remain widely expanded, reflecting elevated volatility and strong directional pressure following the recent acceleration lower. Momentum indicators show extreme conditions, with the RSI dropping sharply into oversold territory, signalling a rapid deterioration in short-term momentum rather than a gradual weakening. 

Trend strength remains elevated, as indicated by high ADX readings, highlighting an active and mature trend environment despite the recent shift in direction. Structurally, price is now positioned well below the former consolidation area around $90,000, with earlier resistance zones near $107,000 and $114,000 far above current levels.

The short answer is yes - but not without strain. The S&P 500 is still holding near record levels, yet beneath the surface, market liquidity is tightening in ways that historically make equity rallies harder to sustain. 

On Wednesday alone, the benchmark index slipped just 0.5%, while the equal-weighted S&P 500 jumped almost 0.9%, a divergence that pushed market dispersion close to the upper end of its historical range.

This matters because liquidity, not earnings, is increasingly setting the tone. With earnings season fading, long-dated bond yields hovering near resistance, and the US Treasury preparing to drain cash from the system, the market’s ability to absorb tighter financial conditions will define the next phase of the S&P 500’s trajectory.

What’s driving the S&P 500 outlook?

Recent price action shows a market being pulled in two directions at once. Mega-cap technology stocks have weighed on the headline S&P 500, while smaller constituents and defensive sectors have quietly advanced. 

The result has been a sharp rise in dispersion, with the dispersion index climbing to around 37.6, a level more commonly associated with peak earnings volatility rather than the end of the reporting season.

One explanation lies in positioning rather than conviction. Implied volatility has been rising more aggressively than in previous quarters, encouraging traders to lean into stable earnings profiles such as consumer staples. Walmart’s continued strength, despite not reporting earnings until mid-February, reflects this behaviour. Rather than a clean sector rotation, the move resembles the same dispersion trades that dominated markets ahead of major technology earnings.

Bond markets are reinforcing this uneasy backdrop. The US 30-year Treasury yield edged back toward 4.9%, once again testing the upper boundary that has capped yields for weeks. 

Under normal circumstances, heavy issuance, persistent deficits, and resilient growth would have pushed yields decisively higher. Instead, rates appear frozen, suggesting that liquidity constraints - not optimism - are anchoring markets in place.

Why it matters

For investors, this divergence is a warning sign. When the S&P 500’s surface stability masks internal stress, markets become more vulnerable to abrupt repricing. Equal-weight strength alongside cap-weighted weakness suggests selective risk reduction rather than broad confidence in future growth.

Liquidity dynamics amplify this risk. The US Treasury has signalled that the Treasury General Account could exceed $1 trillion around tax season, implying roughly $150 billion in additional cash being pulled from markets. 

While increased Treasury bill issuance may soften the impact, analysts broadly agree it will not fully offset the drain. As Sonali Basak of iCapital noted, markets are not pricing in a shock, but “liquidity is no longer providing the same support it did last year”.

Impact on markets and investors

The most immediate effect has been aggressive sector rotation. Technology, particularly software, bore the brunt of Wednesday’s sell-off as concerns over AI disruption and stretched valuations prompted investors to cut exposure. The Nasdaq Composite fell 1.5%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.5%, underscoring how uneven leadership has become.

At the same time, the longer-term AI narrative remains intact. Alphabet’s earnings highlighted plans to lift capital expenditure to as much as $185 billion by 2026, boosting Nvidia and Broadcom even as Alphabet shares slipped. The market response suggests investors are reassessing near-term pricing rather than abandoning the AI theme outright 

For longer-term investors, the risk lies in complacency. If liquidity continues to tighten while rates remain pinned near resistance, volatility could return abruptly once correlations rise and dispersion trades unwind.

Expert outlook

Looking ahead, many strategists expect market dispersion to fade as earnings season ends and tactical positions are unwound. Historically, correlations rise once earnings uncertainty passes, pulling sector performance back into alignment. That process alone could increase volatility, even without a macro shock.

The bigger unknown is liquidity. Weekly jobless claims, Amazon’s earnings, and updates on Treasury funding will be closely watched. A sustained break above 5% in the 30-year yield would likely pressure equity valuations, while continued rate stagnation may signal deeper stress in funding markets. For now, the S&P 500 can absorb tighter liquidity - but only while confidence holds.

Key takeaway

The S&P 500 can withstand tighter liquidity for now, but the margin for safety is shrinking. Divergence within the index, stubborn bond yields, and looming cash drains suggest stability may prove deceptive. As earnings fade from focus, liquidity will take centre stage. The next decisive move will likely come not from profits, but from funding conditions.

Silver’s 30% crash is shaking global markets because it exposed how fragile the recent precious metals rally had become. Experts noted that what appeared to be a structurally driven surge was, in reality, heavily propped up by speculative positioning, leverage, and thin liquidity. When prices turned, forced selling rippled through metals, currencies, and risk assets, triggering a broader reassessment of market stability.

The scale of the move was striking. Spot silver plunged as much as 17% in a single session after briefly trading above $90 an ounce, before collapsing to around $77. 

Gold followed, dropping more than 3.5%, its sharpest fall since 2013. The episode has become a warning shot for investors navigating momentum-driven markets in an uncertain policy environment.

What’s driving silver’s crash?

At the heart of silver’s collapse lies an aggressive build-up - and rapid unwinding - of speculative positions. In the weeks leading up to the peak, investors flooded into leveraged exchange-traded products and call options, pushing prices far beyond levels justified by physical demand. When the rally stalled late last week, those positions turned from tailwinds into liabilities, triggering margin calls and stop-losses in quick succession.

Liquidity conditions made matters worse. Silver trades in a much smaller and less liquid market than gold, particularly in the London over-the-counter market. Goldman Sachs said dealer hedging flipped abruptly from buying into rising prices to selling into falling ones, allowing losses to cascade through the system. The fact that some of the most violent moves occurred while Chinese futures markets were closed suggests Western flows drove both the surge and the unwind.

Why it matters

Silver’s crash mattered because it did not stay contained. According to reports, the sudden reversal weighed on sentiment across metals markets, with copper slipping below $13,000 a tonne and broader commodity prices coming under pressure. When a metal that straddles both safe-haven and industrial roles breaks down so violently, it often signals deeper discomfort with risk.

Analysts also warn that positioning risks have not fully cleared. Sunil Garg, managing director at Lighthouse Canton, said speculative excess “hasn’t been fully flushed out,” despite the sharp correction. While long-term industrial demand for silver remains strong, near-term price action is still being dictated by financial flows rather than end-use consumption.

Impact on markets and investors

For traders, the fallout has been immediate and costly. Metals exchanges, including CME Group, raised margin requirements following the sell-off, increasing the cost of holding leveraged positions and forcing further deleveraging. That dynamic tends to suppress quick rebounds and prolong volatility, particularly in assets that recently attracted momentum traders.

The episode has also drawn uncomfortable comparisons with meme-stock behaviour. Market participants increasingly describe silver’s recent rally as detached from sustainable valuation, driven more by momentum than fundamentals. Steve Sosnick of Interactive Brokers said the metal experienced “momentum trading that exceeded even the outsized moves seen across other speculative assets,” leaving prices vulnerable once sentiment turned.

Expert outlook

Looking ahead, volatility is likely to persist. Standard Chartered analysts said precious metals will remain unstable until there is greater clarity on the US monetary policy outlook, particularly the pace of interest rate cuts. Hawkish comments from Federal Reserve officials have strengthened the US dollar, adding pressure to dollar-denominated metals such as silver.

Political uncertainty has further complicated the picture. Markets are weighing the implications of Kevin Warsh’s nomination as Federal Reserve chair, even as President Donald Trump insists rate cuts remain likely. For silver, traders are watching the $70 level closely. A sustained move below it could deepen risk aversion across asset classes, while holding above it may allow speculative excess to unwind more gradually.

Key takeaway

Silver’s 30% crash shook global markets because it revealed how quickly momentum-driven rallies can unravel under pressure. The sell-off exposed liquidity gaps, excessive leverage, and fragile sentiment across metals markets. While structural demand remains supportive, silver’s path forward depends on whether speculative excess can fully unwind. Traders will be watching the $70 level and US policy signals closely in the days ahead.

Silver technical outlook

Silver has retraced sharply from recent highs following an extended upside move, with the price moving back inside the Bollinger Bands after briefly trading beyond the upper band. Despite the pullback, the bands remain widely expanded, indicating that volatility is still elevated relative to earlier phases. 

Momentum indicators show a clear shift from extreme conditions: the RSI has fallen from overbought levels and is now positioned below the midline, reflecting a significant cooling in momentum. 

Trend strength remains elevated, as evidenced by high ADX readings, indicating that the broader trend environment remains strong even as short-term momentum has weakened. Structurally, price continues to trade well above earlier consolidation areas around $72, $57, and $46.93, underscoring the scale of the prior advance.

The latest tech-led sell-off suggests US stock indices are entering a more fragile phase, where leadership can no longer be taken for granted. On Tuesday, the Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.4%, dragging the S&P 500 down 0.8%, as investors began questioning whether the AI-driven rally still justifies current valuations.

Rather than signalling a full trend reversal, the move suggests the market is recalibrating expectations. With earnings pressure building and volatility spilling into other assets, the next move for US indices will depend on whether Big Tech can restore confidence or whether investors continue to rotate away from crowded growth trades.

What’s driving the tech sell-off?

The immediate catalyst was renewed unease about the sustainability of AI spending. While Palantir’s upbeat earnings reinforced the long-term AI narrative, they failed to offset broader concerns about capital intensity and diminishing marginal returns across the sector. Nvidia’s nearly 3% decline proved particularly influential after reports suggested cooling relations with OpenAI, which has reportedly raised concerns over the performance of Nvidia’s latest AI chips.

That anxiety spread quickly across the software and cloud landscape. Amazon and Microsoft extended recent losses as investors continued to unwind positions in high-multiple names. The launch of a legal productivity tool by AI firm Anthropic added to the pressure, reinforcing fears that faster innovation may accelerate competition rather than protect margins. In this environment, markets are no longer rewarding AI exposure indiscriminately - they are demanding proof of profitability.

Why it matters for US Indices

US indices have become increasingly sensitive to movements in a small cluster of mega-cap technology stocks. The largest technology firms now represent over 30% of the S&P 500’s total market capitalisation, leaving benchmarks exposed when sentiment turns against the sector. When leadership falters, index-level resilience weakens quickly.

According to one US equity strategist, “The issue isn’t belief in AI - it’s whether earnings growth can keep pace with expectations priced into these stocks”. That distinction explains why markets can sell off even amid strong headline results. For indices, the risk lies not in a collapse, but in a prolonged period of uneven performance.

Impact on Markets and Investors

The sell-off has already triggered a visible shift in positioning. While equities retreated, investors rotated into defensive assets, pushing gold up more than 6% in a single session - its largest daily gain since 2008 - after suffering its steepest one-day drop in over 40 years just days earlier. Silver followed with a sharp 9% rebound, driven by aggressive dip-buying.

This divergence suggests investors are reducing exposure to momentum trades rather than abandoning risk entirely. Equity weakness alongside strength in precious metals points to hedging behaviour, not panic. For traders, it reflects a market preparing for more two-way price action, where rallies may face quicker resistance and pullbacks attract selective buying.

Expert outlook

The next directional move for US indices will be shaped by upcoming earnings from AMD, Amazon, and Alphabet, which are expected to provide clearer insight into AI-related spending, margins, and demand visibility. AMD’s results, in particular, are being viewed as a litmus test for whether competition in AI chips can support sector-wide growth rather than dilute returns.

Strategists remain cautious but not outright bearish. Most expect higher volatility as markets transition from narrative-driven optimism to earnings-driven scrutiny. If Big Tech can demonstrate operational discipline alongside growth, indices may stabilise. If not, US equities could enter a broader consolidation phase, marked by rotations rather than sustained upside.

Key takeaway

The tech sell-off signals a shift in how markets price growth, not a rejection of it. US indices remain supported, but leadership is under pressure amid investor demand for earnings discipline. The sharp move into gold highlights rising caution beneath the surface. The next phase will be defined by earnings credibility - and whether Big Tech can justify its outsized influence on the market.

Bitcoin’s latest slide is not just about falling prices - it reflects a clear change in who controls the market. Data showed that the world’s largest cryptocurrency has dropped more than 40% from its October high above $126,000 and briefly fell below $73,000 this week, its lowest level since November 2024. 

Crucially, bitcoin has now slipped below its True Market Mean Price, according to analysts, a valuation threshold that historically separates bull-led markets from bear-dominated ones.

This breakdown comes as global investors retreat from risk amid AI-driven equity sell-offs and rising geopolitical tensions. With gold surging nearly 7% in a single session and volatility climbing across asset classes, bitcoin’s behaviour suggests that market leadership is shifting away from buyers and towards sellers - a transition that could shape price action for months ahead.

What’s driving Bitcoin’s latest drop?

Bitcoin’s decline has unfolded alongside a broader risk-off move across financial markets. US equities stumbled as confidence in the artificial intelligence trade weakened, with the Nasdaq falling 1.4% and major technology stocks selling off sharply. 

Disappointing cloud growth from Microsoft, combined with rising AI investment costs, reignited concerns that valuations across the tech sector had run ahead of sustainable profits.

As equities fell, speculative assets followed suit. Bitcoin traded in lockstep with high-beta technology stocks rather than serving as a hedge, reinforcing its sensitivity to liquidity conditions. When investors reduce risk exposure, bitcoin often absorbs outsized losses, particularly during periods when leverage remains elevated across crypto derivatives markets.

Geopolitical developments compounded the pressure. Reports that the US shot down an Iranian drone near a US aircraft carrier pushed the VIX volatility index briefly above 20, a level associated with heightened market stress. 

Capital rotated rapidly into traditional safe havens, with gold and silver posting double-digit moves over the week, leaving bitcoin on the wrong side of defensive positioning.

Why it matters: A break below the true market mean

The most important signal from this move is bitcoin’s fall below its True Market Mean Price, currently estimated near $80,000. 

This metric reflects the average historical cost basis of all bitcoin holders and is widely used to assess whether the majority of investors are in profit or loss. When prices remain above this level, buyers typically retain control. When prices fall below it, selling pressure often intensifies.

In previous cycles, this shift has marked a change in market regime. During the 2022 downturn, bitcoin’s weekly close below the same metric preceded a seven-month decline that eventually pushed prices down by more than 55%. While current conditions differ, the behavioural response is similar: underwater holders become more inclined to sell rallies, limiting upside momentum.

Gerry O’Shea, head of global market insights at Hashdex, highlighted that bitcoin’s divergence from gold reflects how investors currently perceive risk. Gold has now outperformed bitcoin over the past five years, signalling that markets continue to favour established stores of value during periods of macro uncertainty. That shift in preference matters when assessing who holds pricing power.

Impact on crypto markets and investors

The immediate impact has been visible across the crypto market. Bitcoin’s sharp intraday drop triggered liquidations across leveraged positions, accelerating downside moves and dragging major altcoins lower. When market control shifts towards sellers, volatility tends to rise as thin liquidity amplifies price swings.

For retail investors, the implications are more structural. Many participants entered during the late-2024 rally, meaning a growing share of holders are now sitting on unrealised losses. Historically, this reduces risk appetite and delays recoveries, as confidence takes time to rebuild. Institutional flows have also become more selective, with investors favouring commodities and defensive assets over digital currencies in the current environment.

Expert outlook: What happens next

Looking ahead, analysts expect bitcoin to remain volatile as the market searches for a new equilibrium. Regulatory uncertainty, macroeconomic instability, and tightening financial conditions all limit the likelihood of a rapid rebound. O’Shea expects near-term turbulence to persist as crypto continues to integrate into mainstream financial infrastructure, even as long-term adoption trends remain intact.

History suggests that breaks below key valuation metrics rarely resolve quickly. Instead, markets often enter a prolonged phase of consolidation or gradual decline as weaker hands exit and stronger holders accumulate. Over the next three to six months, bitcoin’s ability to reclaim the $80,000 level will be closely watched as a signal of whether buyers can regain control or whether the balance of power remains firmly with sellers.

Key takeaway

Bitcoin’s latest drop signals more than short-term weakness - it points to a shift in market control away from buyers and towards sellers. As risk appetite fades across global markets, crypto is behaving less like a hedge and more like a speculative asset. The next few months will likely define whether this move becomes a prolonged reset or a base for recovery. For now, patience and risk awareness remain critical.

Bitcoin technical outlook

Bitcoin has continued to move lower within its broader structure, with the price dipping below the lower Bollinger Band before stabilising near $76,400. The Bollinger Bands remain widely expanded, indicating that volatility is still elevated following the recent downside acceleration.

Momentum indicators show early signs of stabilisation: the RSI has begun to rise from oversold territory, reflecting a moderation in downside momentum after the sharp decline. Trend strength remains high, with ADX readings elevated, pointing to an active and mature trend environment despite the recent loss of directional momentum. 

Structurally, price is now positioned well below the former resistance zones around $90,000, $107,000, and $114,000, highlighting the extent of the preceding move. 

Gold and silver prices have mounted a strong rebound after suffering one of their sharpest sell-offs in decades, forcing investors to reassess whether last week’s collapse marked a turning point or a temporary dislocation. 

Spot gold jumped as much as 4% on Tuesday to around $4,820 per ounce, while silver surged nearly 8% to $85 after plunging almost 30% in a single session last week - its worst one-day fall since 1980.

The speed of the recovery has shifted the narrative. What initially looked like a breakdown in safe-haven demand is now being reinterpreted as a violent reset driven by positioning, leverage, and short-term macro shocks. The question facing markets is whether this bounce reflects renewed confidence or merely the absence of forced selling.

What’s driving the Gold and Silver rebound?

The rebound has been driven less by new bullish catalysts and more by the unwinding of extreme stress. Last week’s collapse was exacerbated by margin hikes and forced liquidations amid volatility that surged, particularly in silver. As those margin pressures eased, selling momentum faded, allowing prices to stabilise and rebound.

Investors also began to question whether the sell-off had overshot the fundamentals. Gold and silver had reached record highs earlier in the year amid geopolitical uncertainty, central bank buying, and concerns about long-term fiscal discipline. None of those drivers materially deteriorated during the rout, suggesting prices fell faster than underlying demand weakened.

Currency dynamics added support. While the US dollar initially rallied after Donald Trump nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve chair, gains lost traction as markets priced continuity rather than disruption in monetary policy. That pause reduced pressure on dollar-denominated commodities, helping precious metals regain footing.

Why it matters

The bounce matters because it challenges the idea that gold and silver have entered a sustained downtrend. Strategists at Deutsche Bank said the recent collapse resembled a positioning reset rather than a structural shift, noting that investor intentions across official, institutional, and retail segments are unlikely to have worsened. 

Gold’s role as a strategic asset remains largely intact. Central banks continue to diversify reserves, geopolitical risks persist, and long-term inflation concerns have not vanished. While speculative excess clearly contributed to the sell-off, analysts argue that core demand drivers remain supportive beneath the surface of the volatility.

Silver’s rebound carries different implications. Its smaller market size, higher leverage, and heavier retail participation make it more sensitive to sentiment swings. The speed of its recovery highlights how quickly prices can rebound once forced flows subside, even if volatility remains elevated.

Impact on markets and investors

The stabilisation in gold and silver has helped ease pressure across commodity-linked assets. Mining stocks, which had been hit hard during the sell-off, steadied as prices recovered. Broader equity markets also remained resilient, with major indices holding near record highs despite sharp moves in commodities.

For investors, the episode has reinforced the risks associated with leverage in crowded trades. Margin increases played a decisive role in last week’s rout, particularly in silver. With trading conditions now calmer, price action is likely to become more sensitive to macro signals rather than mechanical liquidation.

Silver’s longer-term industrial story remains a key anchor. Demand tied to solar energy, data centres and AI infrastructure continues to rise. A January study projected that global silver demand could reach 54,000 tonnes annually by 2030, while supply growth lags significantly.

That imbalance suggests volatility does not negate the broader thesis.

Expert outlook

Analysts broadly agree that the rebound does not guarantee a straight path higher. Barclays noted that gold’s broader “bid” can remain resilient amid policy and geopolitical uncertainty, but warned that overheated technical conditions may require a period of consolidation.

Silver’s outlook remains more volatile. eToro analyst Zavier Wong said speculative positioning amplified both the collapse and the rebound, but cautioned against dismissing silver’s fundamental demand. In his view, silver has historically surged ahead of itself during strong cycles before fundamentals reassert control.

The sustainability of the bounce will hinge on external conditions. A renewed rise in the US dollar or real yields could test the recovery, while stable funding conditions and calmer macro signals may allow prices to rebuild more gradually.

Key takeaway

Gold and silver have rebounded sharply after a historic sell-off, suggesting last week’s collapse was driven more by forced positioning than deteriorating fundamentals. While volatility remains high, the structural drivers supporting precious metals demand are still in place. Whether the bounce is sustainable will depend on macro stability, currency trends, and investor restraint. The next phase is likely to be shaped by consolidation rather than collapse.

Gold and Silver technical outlook

Gold remains elevated following its recent surge, with price stabilising after a sharp pullback from the upper Bollinger Band. Although price has moved back inside the bands, they remain widely expanded, indicating that volatility is still elevated relative to earlier periods. 

Momentum indicators show an adjustment rather than a reversal: the RSI has moved back above the midline after briefly dipping, reflecting a stabilisation in momentum following the rapid move. Trend strength remains high, as evidenced by elevated ADX readings, indicating a strong, established trend environment. 

From a structural perspective, price continues to trade well above earlier consolidation zones around $4,035 and $3,935, underscoring the magnitude of the preceding advance.

Silver has experienced a sharp pullback after an extended upside move, with price retreating from recent highs and moving back toward the middle of its broader range. Bollinger Bands remain widely expanded, indicating that volatility is still elevated following the earlier acceleration, even as price has moved back inside the bands. 

Momentum indicators show a notable reset: the RSI has dropped sharply from overbought levels and is now rising back toward the midline, reflecting a moderation in momentum after the extreme phase. 

Trend strength remains elevated, as indicated by high ADX readings, highlighting that the broader trend environment remains strong despite the recent retracement. Structurally, price remains well above earlier consolidation zones around $72, $57, and $46.93, underscoring the scale of the preceding advance.

We’ve rolled out major upgrades to trading conditions across metals, cryptocurrencies, and US indices — giving you lower trading costs, higher leverage, and more flexibility on some of the most actively traded global markets.

Whether you’re trading short-term moves or scaling longer strategies, these improvements are designed to help you trade with more competitive conditions. 

Here’s what’s changed, instrument by instrument.

Metals trading

Deriv has upgraded trading conditions on silver and gold, expanded accessibility with micro contracts, and launched a new metals market — copper.

What’s improved

‍

New instrument launch: Copper (XCUUSD)

Expand your metals trading beyond gold and silver, with leverage available up to 1:500. Trade copper, which is closely tied to global growth and industrial demand, giving you another way to diversify metals strategies beyond gold and silver.

Crypto trading

Trading conditions across major cryptocurrencies have been significantly improved, making it easier to trade fast-moving markets more efficiently.

What’s improved

US indices

US indices now come with major upgrades to leverage, spreads, and adjustments, making them even more competitive for short- and medium-term traders.

What’s improved

Multipliers trading

Prefer defined-risk trading? Multipliers have also been upgraded with lower adjustments and higher multiplier levels.

Trade now with better conditions on Deriv

Lower trading costs directly impact your bottom line. Whether you're a day trader executing multiple positions or a swing trader holding longer-term views, reduced spreads and better trading conditions mean more of your potential profits remain in your account. As always, higher leverage offers greater market exposure and flexibility, but it also increases risk, so it’s important to trade in line with your strategy and risk tolerance.

‍