Iran says it is still waiting for mediators to confirm Washington's official position, even after President Trump told reporters he had rejected Tehran's seven-day proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The uncertainty has kept a supply risk premium in crude oil, though prices remain within their recent range rather than spiking.

What Iran proposed and why Trump rejected it

At the UN General Assembly in New York last week, Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, presented a phased plan to Trump's envoy: within seven days, Iran would begin steps to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restart nuclear talks, in exchange for the US lifting its naval blockade of Iranian ports, releasing frozen Iranian assets, restoring the sanctions waiver on Iranian oil exports, and observing a broader regional ceasefire.

Trump told reporters at the White House on Saturday, "They made a proposal but I reject it," adding that he believes Iran is "losing so badly" that it is pushing for a quick deal. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump is privately sceptical Iran will agree to dismantle its nuclear programme and has told aides he expects strikes to resume after the November US midterm elections.

Despite the public rejection, Araghchi said on Sunday that mediators had not yet formally conveyed a US decision. "We are waiting for the mediators to convey the definitive positions to us, and we will make a decision based on them," he said, maintaining that Iran's conditions "are clear" and non-negotiable.

Why the Strait of Hormuz matters for oil markets

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important shipping chokepoints, historically carrying around a fifth of global oil and gas flows. Since the conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran began in February 2026, a US naval blockade and repeated attacks in the area have disrupted shipping through the strait, tightening effective supply even where production itself hasn't fallen.

This is why traders track diplomatic headlines here as closely as they track official inventory or OPEC+ data: any credible step toward reopening the strait removes a chunk of the risk premium currently priced into crude, while confirmation that talks have collapsed tends to support prices.

How the market has actually reacted

Hopes that a deal was close had already pushed November WTI crude down 2.33% to around $92 a barrel, marking its first weekly decline since late August — a sign the market had started pricing in at least a partial de-escalation before Trump's comments. With the rejection now public but not yet formally confirmed through official channels, prices are holding near that level rather than reversing sharply, reflecting genuine uncertainty about what happens next rather than a clear directional signal.

What traders are watching next

A few developments are likely to move oil prices from here:

• Formal confirmation from mediators. Until Qatari mediators officially relay a US position to Tehran, Iran says it won't make a final decision, so the current headline risk could still shift in either direction.
• Signs of renewed military action. Reports suggest Trump has discussed resuming strikes after the US midterms in November, which would likely widen the risk premium further out on the calendar.
• Iran's domestic political dynamics. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has said Tehran remains open to talks but "will not accept bullying or coercion," while hardliners within Iran's security establishment may resist compromises he has floated.
• Broader regional spillover. Iran-aligned Houthi forces in Yemen continue to target Saudi interests, and any escalation there adds a separate layer of supply risk beyond Hormuz itself.

Trading this kind of headline risk

Geopolitical news like this tends to produce sharp, fast moves in oil prices that can reverse quickly once the next headline lands — as seen with the initial optimism-driven decline in WTI followed by the current stabilisation. This makes it a market where risk management matters as much as directional analysis.

Position sizing, stop-loss levels, and awareness of how much capital is at risk on any single trade all become more important during periods of elevated volatility, since even a well-reasoned view on the direction of oil prices can be tested by sudden swings driven by a single statement or diplomatic development. No approach to trading removes this risk entirely; it can only be managed.

Traders following this story on Deriv UAE can track relevant instruments such as WLDOIL to see how sentiment around the Hormuz standoff is being priced in real time, and can use Deriv's economic calendar to stay across scheduled statements or diplomatic updates that may affect volatility.

Given how quickly headlines are shifting on this story, it's worth practising on a demo account before trading it live, so you can test how you'd react to a fast-moving oil price without risking real funds.

‍